Reconfiguraring Zinā: The Criminalization of Adultery in Modern Egyptian Criminal Law
Al-Azhar University, Egypt and University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2025.632.283-321
Abstract
The Egyptian parliamentary debates on the criminalization of adultery reveal how Sharīʻa is invoked to penalize conduct that does not correspond to the conceptual foundations, definitions, evidentiary standards, or procedural rules of zinā in Islamic jurisprudence. This article examines how opposing sides in these debates construct their legal arguments and deploy distinct modes of reasoning, each grounding its position in Sharīʻa to justify the penalization of adultery. It asks why Sharīʻa doctrines of zinā are mobilized to legitimize the criminalization of adultery in Egyptian criminal law. The article argues that this strategy generates ambiguity, inconsistency, and doctrinal indeterminacy, while simultaneously undermining the function of modern criminal law within the framework of the modern state. In doing so, it produces a distorted mode of rearticulating Sharīʻa within contemporary legal institutions. Finally, the article contends that any attempt to reclaim Sharīʻa within the modern state must take into account the public function of criminal justice institutions, particularly their role in securing constitutional values such as fairness, non-discrimination, justice, and equality.
[Perdebatan parlementer di Mesir mengenai kriminalisasi perzinaan memperlihatkan bagaimana syariat Islam diargumentasikan untuk menghukum suatu perbuatan yang tidak sejalan dengan landasan konseptual, definisi, standar pembuktian, maupun prosedur zinā dalam fikih Islam. Artikel ini mengkaji bagaimana pihak-pihak yang berseberangan dalam perdebatan tersebut membangun argumen hukum mereka dan menggunakan metode penalaran yang berbeda, masing-masing dengan mendasarkan posisinya pada Syariat untuk membenarkan kriminalisasi perzinaan. Pertanyaan utama yang diajukan adalah mengapa doktrin Syariat tentang zinā dimobilisasi untuk melegitimasi kriminalisasi perzinaan dalam hukum pidana Mesir. Artikel ini berargumen bahwa strategi tersebut melahirkan ambiguitas, inkonsistensi, dan ketidakpastian doktrinal, sekaligus melemahkan fungsi hukum pidana modern dalam kerangka negara modern. Dalam prosesnya, hal ini menghasilkan cara yang terdistorsi dalam mengartikulasikan kembali Syariat di dalam institusi hukum kontemporer. Pada akhirnya, artikel ini menegaskan bahwa setiap upaya untuk mereklaim Syariat dalam negara modern harus mempertimbangkan fungsi publik lembaga peradilan pidana, khususnya perannya dalam menjamin nilai-nilai konstitusional seperti keadilan, non-diskriminasi, kesetaraan, dan kepastian hukum.]
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-ʻAwwā, Muḥammad Salīm, “Bayna al-Qāʻida al-Qānūnīyyah wa’l-Qāʻidah al-Khuluqīyyah”, Majallat Kullīyat al-Sharīʻa wa’l-Dirāsāt al-Islāmīyah ,vol. 5, 1987, pp. 191-219.
Al-ʻAwwā, Fī Uṣūl al-Niẓām al-Jināʼī al-Islāmī, Cairo: Nahḍat Miṣr, 2006.
ʻAbd al-Barr, Muḥammad ʻAbd al-Fattāḥ, “Al-Ḥimāyah al-Dustūrīyah li’l-Khuṣuṣiyyah al-Thaqāfīyah”, Majallat al-Maḥkamah al-Dustūrīyah al-ʻUlyā, vol. 31, 2022.
Abd al-Fattah, Nabil, “The Anarchy of Egyptian Legal system”, in Legal Pluralism in the Arab World, ed. by Badouin Dupret, Maurits Berger, and Laila Al-Zwaini, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 1999.
Abū Zahrah, Muhammad, Al-Jarīmah wa’l-ʻUqūbah fī’l-Fiqh al-Islāmī, Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-ʻArabī 1998.
An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed, “The Compatibility Dialectic: Mediating the Legitimate Coexistence of Islamic Law and State Law”, Modern Law Review, vol. 7, no. 1, 2010, pp. 1-29, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00782.x.
An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed, “Sharia and Positive Legislation: Is an Islamic State Possible or Viable?”, 5 Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law, vol. 5, no. 1, 1998, pp. 29-41, https://doi.org/10.1163/221129899X00043.
ʻAuda, ʻAbd al-Qādir, al-Tashrīʻ al-Jināʼī al-Islāmī Muqāranan bi’l-Qānūn al-Waḍʻī, Cairo: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʻArabī.
Bahnasī, Aḥmad Fatḥī, al-Jarāʼim fī’l-Fiqh al-Islāmī, Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq, 1988.
Bahnasī, Aḥmad Fatḥī, Naẓarīyat al-Ithbāt fī’l-Fiqh al-Jināʼī al-Islāmī, Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq, 1989.
Bahnasī, Aḥmad Fatḥī, al-Siyāsah al-Jināʼīyah fī’l-Sharīʻa al-Islāmīyah, Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq, 1998.
Bakr, ʻAbd al-Muhaimin, Al-Qism Al-Khāṣṣ fī Qānūn al-ʻUqūbāt, Cairo: Dār al-Nahḍah Al-ʻArabīyah, 1970.
Bihnām, Ramsīs, Naẓarīyat al-Tajrīm fī’l-Qānūn al-Jināʼī, Cairo: Mansha’at al-Maʻārif 1996.
Brown, Nathan J., “Islam in Egypt’s Cacophonous Constitutional Order”, in The Rule of Law, Islam, and Constitutional Politics in Egypt and Iran, ed. by Saïd Amir Arjomand and Nathan J. Brown, New York: SUNY Press, 2013.
Cairo’s Economic Court, Ruling No. 479/ 2020, 27 July 2020.
Chiao, Vincent, Criminal Law in the Age of the Administrative State, New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Chiao, Vincent, What is the Criminal Law For?”, Law and Philosophy, vol. 35, no. 2, 2016, pp. 137-63, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-015-9247-8.
Committee of Sharīʻa Codification, Lajnat Taqnīn al-Sharīʻa: al-Jalasāt al-Tamhidiyyah, Dār Ibn Rajab and Dār Al-Fawāʼid, 2013.
Damanhur’s Criminal Court, Case No. 16660/ 2017, 18 January 2018.
Devlin, Patrick, The Enforcement of Morals, London: Oxford University Press, 1967.
El-Din, Gamal Essam, “Criminal Procedures Law Approved”, Ahram Online, 1 May 2025, https://english.ahram.org.eg/News/545443.aspx, accessed 25 May 2025.
Duff, Anthony R., The Realm of Criminal Law, New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Duff, Anthony R., “Defending the Realm of Criminal Law”, Criminal Law and Philosophy, vol. 14, no. 3, 2020, pp. 465-500, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-020-09548-3.
Dupret, Baudouin, Positive Law from the Muslim World: Jurisprudence, History, Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
Dworkin, Gerald, “Devlin Was Right: Law and the Enforcement of Morality”, William & Mary Law Review, vol. 40, no. 3, 1999, pp. 927-46, https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol40/iss3/11.
Extra News, “The Parliament Discusses the Provisions of the Criminal Procedural Law Proposal”, Extra News, 29 December 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiPkT7K25-Q&list=WL&index=30&t=1044s, accessed 25 May 2025.
Ezzat, Ahmed, “Law and Moral Regulation in Modern Egypt: Ḥisba from Tradition to Modernity”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, vol. 52, no. 4, 2020, pp. 665-84, https://doi.org/10.1017/S002074382000080X.
Fangary, Farah, and Rana Mamdouh, “House Approves New Criminal Procedures Law, Codifying ‘Violations’ Despite Widespread Opposition”, Madamasr, 29 April 2025, https://www.madamasr.com/en/2025/04/29/news/u/house-approves-new-criminal-procedures-law-codifying-violations-despite-widespread-opposition/, accessed 25 May 2025.
Faraḥāt, Ḥossām, “Al-Ḥimāyah al-Dustūrīyah Ḍidda al-Tamyīz ʻalā Asās al-Dīn fī Miṣr”, Majallat al-Maḥkamah al-Dustūrīyah al-ʻUlyā, vol. 11, 2007.
Farmer, Lindsay, Making the Modern Criminal Law: Criminalization and Civil Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Feinberg, Joel, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Harm to Others, New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2nd edition, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Ḥāfiẓ M, Al-Jarāʼim al-Mukhillah bi’l-Adāb, Cairo: Dār al-ʻAdālah, 2007.
Hamid, D. A., The Trap: Punishing Sexual Difference in Egypt, Kairo: Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, 2017.
Harcourt, Bernard, “Mill’s On Liberty and the Modern ‘Harm to Others’ Principle”, in Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law, ed. by Markus D. Dubber, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Hart, H. L. A., Law, Liberty, and Morality, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1963.
Hopwood, Shon, “Clarity in Criminal Law”, American Criminal Law Review, vol. 54, no. 3, 2017, pp. 695-749.
Human Rights Watch, “Review of Egypt’s Draft Criminal Procedure Code”, Human Rights Watch, 2 October 2024, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/10/02/review-egypts-draft-criminal-procedure-code, accessed 25 May 2025.
Husak, Douglas, Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Husni, Mahmud Najib, al-Fiqh al-Jināʼī al-Islāmī, Cairo: Dār al-Nahḍah al-ʻArabīyyah, 2018.
Ibn al-ʻArabī, Muḥammad b. ʻAbdallāh Abū Bakr, Aḥkām al-Qurʼān, Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah, 2003.
Ibn Qudāmah, Abdullah b. Ahmad, Al-Mughnī, Cairo: Maktabat Al-Qāhirah, 1969.
Ibn Rushd, Muḥammad b. Aḥmad, Bidāyah al-Mujtahid wa Nihāyah al-Muqtaṣid, Cairo: Dār al-Hadīth, 2004.
Jumaa, ʻAlī, “Istikhdām al-Wasāʼil al-ʻIlmīyyah al-Ḥadīthah fī Ithbāt Jarīmat al-Zinā”, Dar al-Iftaa Website, 22 Feb 2009, https://www.dar-alifta.org/ar/fatwa/details/12868/حكم-استخدام-الوسائل-العلمية-الحديثة-في-إثبات-جريمة-الزنا, accessed 25 May, 2025.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim, “Punishment in Islamic Law: A Critique of the Hudud Bill of Kelantan, Malaysia”, Arab Law Quarterly, vol. 13, no.3, 1998, pp.203-34, https://doi.org/10.1163/026805598125826102.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim, Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law: A Fresh Interpretation, New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Al-Kāsānī, Abū Bakr b. Mas’ūd, Badāʼiʻ al-Ṣanāʼiʻ fī Tartīb al-Sharāʼiʻ, Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyyah, 2003.
Katz, Leora Dahan, “Criminal Law: Political or Moral? Defending A Complementary Conception of Criminal Law in the Age of the Administrative State”, Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, 2018, pp. 111-27, https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jly003.
Khalīfah, Aḥmad Muḥammad, Al-Naẓarīyah al-ʻĀmmah li’l-Tarjīm: Dirāsah fī Falsafat al-Qānūn al-Jināʼī, Cairo: Dār al-Maʻārif, 1959.
Khawaja, Bassam, “Egypt’s Catastrophic Draft Criminal Procedure Code: Codifies Abuses, Further Undermines Justice System”, Human Rights Watch, 20 December 2024, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/12/20/egypts-catastrophic-draft-criminal-procedure-code, accessed 25 May 2025.
Korbatieh, S., “Evidence Rules in Sharīʻa and the Impact of Modern Technology and DNA Testing”, Australian Journal of Islamic Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, 2020, pp. 4-29, https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v5i3.303.
Magid, Pesha, “Fight the man: Laws That Help Women and Laws That Hurt Them” Madamasr, 9 March 2015, https://www.madamasr.com/en/2015/03/09/feature/society/fight-the-man-laws-that-help-women-and-laws-that-hurt-them/, accessed 25 May 2025.
Al-Mardāwy, ʻAlī ibn Aḥmad, al-Inṣāf fī Maʻrifat al-Rājiḥ min al-Khilāf, Cairo: Hajr, 1995.
Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Mir-Hosseini, Ziba, “Criminalizing Sexuality: Zina Laws as Violence Against Women in Muslim Contexts”, SUR-International Journal on Human Rights, vol. 8, no. 15, 2011, pp. 6-33.
Mohammad, Fida, and Richard Lee, “Evidentiary Standards for Sexual Offenses in Islam”, Pakistan Journal of Criminology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2015, pp. 29-43.
Moore, Michael S., “Liberty’s Constraints on What Should be Made Criminal”, in Criminalization: The Political Morality of the Criminal Law, ed. by R. A. Duff et al., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Moore, Michael S., Placing Blame: A Theory of the Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Murry, B., Al-Jarāʼim al-Mukhillah bi’l-Ādāb fī Ḍawʼ al-Fiqh wa Aḥkām al-Naqḍ, Cairo: Dar al-Ahram, 2024.
Napoleon, Mohamed, “Masār Jadīd li’l-Qaḍāʼ ʻala Nuṣūṣ al-Tamyīz fi ʻUqūbah al-Zinā bi’l-Tashrīʻ al-Miṣrī”, Manshūrāt Qānūneya, 10 January 2021, https://manshurat.org/node/70194, accessed 25 May 2025.
Napolion, Mohamed, “UN Concerns Over Egypt’s Criminal Procedure Code Draft”, Manassa, 14 May 2025, https://manassa.news/en/news/24163, accessed 25 May 2025.
Nūr, Aḥmad Ḥāfiẓ, Jarīmat al-Zinā fi’l-Qānūn al-Miṣrī wa’l-Muqāran, Cairo: Nahḍat Miṣr Press, 1958.
Peters, Rudolph, Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law: Theory and Practice from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
Petersen, Thomas Søbirk, “What is Legal Moralism?” SATS, vol. 12, no. 1, 2011, pp. 80-8, https://doi.org/10.1515/sats.2011.006.
Qandīl, Moḥamed Ḥussein, “Ithbāt al-Zinā: Dirāsah Muqāranah baina’l-Sharīʻa wa’l-Qānūn”, Majallat al-Buḥūth al-Fiqhīyah wa’l-Qānūnīyah, vol. 15, no. 18, 2003, pp. 708-92.
Quaraishi, Asifa, “Her Honor: An Islamic Critique of the Rape Laws of Pakistan from a Woman-Sensitive Perspective”, Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 18, no. 2, 1997, pp. 287-320, https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol18/iss2/2.
Renzo, Massimo, “Law, Liberty, and Morality: Fifty Years On”, Criminal Law and Philosophy, vol. 7, no. 3, 2013, pp. 417-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-013-9244-7.
Salmān, ‘Abd al-‘Azīz, “Al-Ḥudūd al-Dustūrīyah li Ḥurrīyat al-ʻAqīdah”, Majallat al-Maḥkamah al-Dustūrīyah al-ʻUlyā, vol. 10, 2006.
Al-Shāfiʻī, Muḥammad ibn Idrīs, Al-Umm, Cairo: Dār al-Wafāʼ, 2001.
Stephen, James Fitzjames, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, ed. by Stuart D. Warner, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1993.
Surūr, Aḥmad Fatḥī, Al-Ḥimāyah al-Dustūrīyah li’l-Ḥuqūq wa’l-Hurrīyāt, Cairo: Dar al--Shurūq, 2000.
Surūr, Aḥmad Fatḥī, al-Wasīṭ fī Qānūn al-Ijrāʼāt al-Jināʼīyah, Cairo: Dār al-Nahḍah al-ʻArabīyah, 2016.
Tarek, Mohamed, “How Authorities Targeted Rising Online Stars for Violating Family Values”, Madamasr, 10 November 2020, https://www.madamasr.com/en/2020/11/10/feature/politics/how-authorities-targeted-rising-online-stars-for-violating-family-values, accessed May 25th, 2025.
The 2014 Egyptian constitution
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Appeal No. 10445, Judicial Year 64, 9 March 2000.
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Appeal No. 119, Judicial Year No. 14, 13 December 1943.
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Appeal No. 1357, Judicial Year No. 53, 12 October 1983.
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Appeal No. 1369, Judicial Year No. 47, 22 May 1978.
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Appeal No. 148, Judicial Year No. 41, 31 May 1971.
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Appeal No. 18863, Judicial Year No. 62, 16 November 1995.
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Appeal No. 24855, Judicial Year No. 64, 10 March 1997.
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Appeal No. 333, Judicial Year No. 32, 29 May 1962.
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Appeal No. 477, Judicial Year No. 44, 10 June 1974.
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Appeal No. 697, Judicial Year No. 11, 19 May 1941.
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Appeal No. 7835, Judicial Year 59, 9 January 1990.
The Egyptian Court of Cassation, Collection of Legal Principles, Vol. 5, No. 259, 471.
The Egyptian Criminal Law No. 58/ 1937
The Egyptian Criminal Law No. 58/ 1937
The Egyptian Criminal Procedure Law No. 50/ 1950
The Egyptian Supreme Administrative Court, Appeal No. 15575, Judicial Year 49, 25 March 2006.
The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Case No. 105, Judicial Year No. 12, 12 February 1994.
The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Case No. 248, Judicial Year No. 30, 6 June 2020.
The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Case No. 29, Judicial Year No. 11, 26 March 1994.
The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Case No. 3, Judicial Year No. 10, 2 January 1993.
The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Case No. 318, Judicial Year No. 23, 4 July 2020.
The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Case No. 34, Judicial Year No. 10, 3 February 1990.
The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Case No. 5, Judicial Year No. 13, 6 January 1996.
The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Case No. 54, Judicial Year No. 37, 6 July 2019.
The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court, Case No. 7, Judicial Year No. 2, 1 March 1975.
The Report of the Great Britain Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution (Wolfenden Report), Command No. 247/ 1957, Paras. 61 and 62.
Thorburn, Malcolm, “Constitutionalism and the Limits of the Criminal Law”, in The Structures of the Criminal Law, ed. by R. A. Duff et al., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, “Egypt: Concerns over the draft Code of Criminal Procedure”, United Nations, 13 May 2025, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-briefing-notes/2025/05/egypt-concerns-over-draft-code-criminal-procedure, accessed 25 May 2025.
Zulfiqar Adnan, “Pursuing Over-Criminalization at the Expense of Islamic Law” Journal of Islamic Law, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020, pp. 189-93, https://doi.org/10.53484/jil.v1.zulfiqar.
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdalgaber Mohamed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







